Both score 90/100 and both are max-cushion daily trainers you could happily run every easy mile in. The Clifton 9 is 42g lighter (246g vs 288g), $20 cheaper ($132–$145 vs $149–$165), and rides on a lower 5mm drop with Hoka's rockered geometry. The 1080v13 counters with a bigger 38mm stack, a slightly higher 8mm drop, marginally better energy return (62% vs 60%), the widest toebox in this class (97mm vs 96mm), and New Balance's full wide-width range (2E/4E) that Hoka can't match.
Hoka Clifton 9 | New Balance Fresh Foam 1080 v13 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $132 | $149 |
| Weight | 246g | 288g |
| Heel drop | 5mm | 8mm |
| Heel stack | 36mm | 38mm |
| Midsole feel | 20 HC | 21 HC |
| CoreScore | 90 | 90 |
| Arch support | neutral | neutral |
| Best for | Recovery, All-day wear, New runners | Long runs, High mileage, Max comfort |
| Not ideal for | Speed work, Ground feel | Speed work, Minimal preference |
Who should buy which
Choose the Clifton 9 for the lighter, nimbler take on max cushion — and the better price. It's the higher-value pick (84 vs 82) if standard widths fit you.
Choose the 1080v13 if you need wide widths, prefer a mid-range 8mm drop, or want the plusher big-stack feel for long runs — its extra 42g buys a noticeably more substantial platform.
Not sure which fits yourfeet? Answer 7 quick questions and we'll rank every shoe in our catalogue for your exact profile.
Take the 2-minute finder quiz